[GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Sameer Kumar
Hi, I am trying to do a custom build (and generate binary and source RPM) package for PostgreSQL. I know community already has a RPM package, but I am trying to do a custom build. I am using attached SPEC file. But I am not able to get binary rpm. rpmbuild always gives me source rpm only. Is

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Albe Laurenz
Sameer Kumar wrote: I am trying to do a custom build (and generate binary and source RPM) package for PostgreSQL. I know community already has a RPM package, but I am trying to do a custom build. I am using attached SPEC file. But I am not able to get binary rpm. rpmbuild always gives

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:30 +, Albe Laurenz wrote: Start looking here: http://yum.postgresql.org/srpms/9.3/redhat/rhel-6-x86_64/repoview/postgresql93.html The source RPMs contain the spec file. Also, http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser/rpm/redhat/9.3/postgresql/ is the SVN repo for 9.3

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Paquier
That On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sameer Kumar sameer.ku...@ashnik.comwrote: Hi, I am trying to do a custom build (and generate binary and source RPM) package for PostgreSQL. I know community already has a RPM package, but I am trying to do a custom build. I am using attached SPEC

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Sameer Kumar
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote: Sameer Kumar wrote: I am trying to do a custom build (and generate binary and source RPM) package for PostgreSQL. I know community already has a RPM package, but I am trying to do a custom build. I am using

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] [pgrpm-HACKERS]SPEC file for PostgreSQL

2013-12-06 Thread Sameer Kumar
Thanks everyone for helping. If I were you, I'd simply take the community spec and modify it for my needs, it is already really complete and contains automatic management of for example translation files, smth that is always a pain to maintain manually. I agree and that is why I asked for it