Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is also possible for mailing list software to handle this preference for
you (by not sending copies to addresses on the list that appear in the
recipient headers), but I don't know if the software in use has that
capability.
I've noticed some
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:59:07AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
(On that note I would dearly love to get rid of the stupid [GENERAL]
[HACKERS] etc tags? Filtering on subject is a dumb way to filter your mail,
I am with you on this. I find the tag useless and annoying.
--
Alvaro Herrera ([EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:59:07AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
(On that note I would dearly love to get rid of the stupid [GENERAL]
[HACKERS] etc tags? Filtering on subject is a dumb way to filter your mail,
there are perfectly good headers inserted by the list manager that don't get
confused
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA and
(assuming it has the capability) all used the 'reply to list' command
to reply
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:33:18 +,
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is also possible for mailing list software to handle this
preference for you (by not sending copies to addresses on the list
that appear in the recipient headers), but I don't know if the
software in use has that capability.
That's a good point.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:49:46 +,
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a perpetual problem, if people all used the same MUA and
(assuming it has the capability) all used the 'reply to list' command
to reply to the list everything would be wonderful! :-)
I think using
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
The procmail rules I set up for each mailing list to which I subscribe
sets Reply-To to the mailing
Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
---
Jim Seymour wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
No, the poster will still be included as part of the headers ... what
happens, at least under Pine, is that
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are you saying this is going to make it impossible for me to reply just
to the poster, or is this an option that is set by the user via majordomo?
No, the poster will still be included as part of the headers ... what
11 matches
Mail list logo
