Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance

2016-09-26 Thread David G. Johnston
Its considered bad form to post to multiple lists. Please pick the most relevant one - in this case I'd suggest -general. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:39 AM, dby...@163.com wrote: > > Array is not convenient to use in function, whether > there are other methods can be replaced temp table in functi

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance

2016-09-26 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-09-26 17:39 GMT+02:00 dby...@163.com : > test: > create type h3 as (id int,name char(10)); > > CREATE or replace FUNCTION proc17() > RETURNS SETOF h3 AS $$ > DECLARE > v_rec h3; > BEGIN > create temp table abc(id int,name varchar) on commit drop; > insert into abc select 1,'lw'; > inser

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] temporary table vs array performance

2016-09-26 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:18 AM, 邓彪 wrote: > we have to do dml in temp table,the CTE is not fit > > ​Moving this to -general only...​ ​Please direct all replies to the list. You are asking for help but not providing any context for what your requirements are. You are not likely to get good hel