Albretch Mueller wrote:
import/export the data into/out of PG, so you will be essentially
duplicating the data and having to synch it. This is exactly what I am
trying to avoid, I would like for PG to handle the data right from the
data feed
You could write a set-returning function that reads
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Albretch Mueller
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Oliver Jowett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> That's essentially the same as the COPY you quoted in your
> original email,
> >> isn't it? So.. what exactly
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Albretch Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's essentially the same as the COPY you quoted in your original email,
>> isn't it? So.. what exactly is it you want to do that COPY doesn't
Albretch Mueller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's essentially the same as the COPY you quoted in your original email,
isn't it? So.. what exactly is it you want to do that COPY doesn't do?
~
well, actually, not exactly; based on:
~
http:/
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's essentially the same as the COPY you quoted in your original email,
> isn't it? So.. what exactly is it you want to do that COPY doesn't do?
~
well, actually, not exactly; based on:
~
http://postgresql.com.cn/docs/
