Am 27.09.2012, 02:04 Uhr, schrieb Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:21 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
dep...@depesz.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:09PM -0400, Robert Sosinski wrote:
The first query shows a cost of 190,169.55 and runs in 199,806.951 ms.
When I
On 09/26/2012 01:38 PM, Robert Sosinski wrote:
I seem to be getting an inaccurate cost from explain. Here are two
examples for one query with two different query plans:
Well, there's this:
Nested Loop (cost=0.00..151986.53 rows=2817 width=4) (actual
time=163.275..186869.844 rows=43904
Em 26/09/2012 17:03, Shaun Thomas escreveu:
On 09/26/2012 01:38 PM, Robert Sosinski wrote:
I seem to be getting an inaccurate cost from explain. Here are two
examples for one query with two different query plans:
Well, there's this:
Nested Loop (cost=0.00..151986.53 rows=2817 width=4)
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:09PM -0400, Robert Sosinski wrote:
The first query shows a cost of 190,169.55 and runs in 199,806.951 ms.
When I disable nested loop, I get a cost of 2,535,992.34 which runs in
only 133,447.790 ms. We have run queries on our database with a cost
of 200K cost
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:21 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
dep...@depesz.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:09PM -0400, Robert Sosinski wrote:
The first query shows a cost of 190,169.55 and runs in 199,806.951 ms.
When I disable nested loop, I get a cost of 2,535,992.34 which runs in
Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com writes:
That said, looking at your actual query:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT eu.id)
FROM exchange_uploads eu
JOIN upload_destinations ud ON ud.id = eu.upload_destination_id
LEFT JOIN uploads u ON u.id = eu.upload_id
LEFT JOIN import_errors ie ON
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:21 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
dep...@depesz.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:09PM -0400, Robert Sosinski wrote:
The first query shows a cost of 190,169.55 and runs in 199,806.951 ms.
When I disable nested loop, I get a cost of 2,535,992.34 which runs in
