Dimitri,
> Seems to me that :
> - GreenPlum provides some commercial parallel query engine on top of
>PostgreSQL,
I certainly think so and so do our customers in production with 100s of
terabytes :-)
> - plproxy could be a solution to the given problem.
>https://developer.skype.com/
Hi,
Le mercredi 18 juillet 2007, Jonah H. Harris a écrit :
> On 7/18/07, Benjamin Arai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I want to parrallelize searches if possible to reduce
> > the perofrmance loss of having multiple tables.
>
> PostgreSQL does not support parallel query. Parallel query on top
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:30:48AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> EnterpriseDB, a commercially enhanced version of PostgreSQL can do
> query parallelization, but it comes at a cost, and that cost is making
> sure you have enough spindles / I/O bandwidth that you won't be
> actually slowing your syst
On 7/18/07, Benjamin Arai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If I have a query such as:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM A) UNION ALL (SELECT * FROM B) WHERE
blah='food';
Assuming the table A and B both have the same attributes and the data
between the table is not partitioned in any special way, does
On 7/18/07, Benjamin Arai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I want to parrallelize searches if possible to reduce
the perofrmance loss of having multiple tables.
PostgreSQL does not support parallel query. Parallel query on top of
PostgreSQL is provided by ExtenDB and PGPool-II.
--
Jonah H. Harr
