On Wed, 05 May 2004 13:30:19 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yup, that's a gotcha. Patch applied to 7.4 and HEAD branches.
Hey, that was a -r diff. It was not intended for you :-)
I had planned to send a -c diff to -patches, as soon as I have a
suitable regression test. I thought o
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had planned to send a -c diff to -patches, as soon as I have a
> suitable regression test.
Like what? The existing stats test seems to catch this just fine on
machines where the types are actually different sizes. In any case,
I don't necessary beli
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Vik, I guess that on your platform time_t is smaller than long.
> Ok, this is pretty clear now. Apply this patch and recompile Postgres.
Yup, that's a gotcha. Patch applied to 7.4 and HEAD branches.
regards, tom lane
-
On Mon, 3 May 2004 20:47:31 -0400, Vikram Kulkarni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>test=# SELECT timeofday();
> timeofday
>-
> Wed Dec 31 16:00:00.591964 1969 PST
>(1 row)
>[...]
>That obviously doesn't look right. Isnt' timeofday() supposed to return
>t
