[GENERAL] 8.0.0beta2: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'

2004-09-08 Thread Ed L.
Is this pthreads warning of any concern? gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -pthread -pthreads -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -fpic -shared -Wl,-soname,libecpg.so.4 execute.o typename.o descriptor.o data.o error.o prepare.o me

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0.0beta2: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'

2004-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Ed L. wrote: > Is this pthreads warning of any concern? > > gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wmissing-declarations -pthread -pthreads -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE > -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -fpic -shared -Wl,-soname,libecpg.so.4 execute.o > typename.o descriptor.o da

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0.0beta2: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'

2004-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No. The problem is that the test script just tries all options and if > it doesn't error out, it uses it. Ideally we could test from configure > and ingnore meaningless options but we don't know how yet. Drop any options that cause the compiler to writ

Re: [GENERAL] 8.0.0beta2: gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'

2004-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No. The problem is that the test script just tries all options and if > > it doesn't error out, it uses it. Ideally we could test from configure > > and ingnore meaningless options but we don't know how yet. > > Drop any options tha