Hello!
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Sam Mason wrote:
> Not sure if that's the sort of thing that you want/need but I don't
> think there's a general solution to the problem. Determining the
> relevant context for this sort of thing is hard.
The solutions you and Steve Atkins offered seem wh
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:42:59AM +0400, Sergey Samokhin wrote:
> But how do programmers guarantee that ALTER's they have wrote will
> always be applied by administrators to the corresponding version of
> the database?
How about using the normal integrity constraints that databases provide?
Have
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Sergey Samokhin wrote:
Hello.
As I know upgrading database structure from one version to another is
usually done by applying some sql-script with a set of ALTER's that do
all the work.
But how do programmers guarantee that ALTER's they have wrote will
always be ap
Hello.
As I know upgrading database structure from one version to another is
usually done by applying some sql-script with a set of ALTER's that do
all the work.
But how do programmers guarantee that ALTER's they have wrote will
always be applied by administrators to the corresponding version of
