Steve Crawford wrote:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations. Don't know if it's
practical for 8.3 documentation but it would be nice to add even if it
only has a few entries as additional ones could be collected via the
user notes.
I suggest as a discussion starting-point the
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:28:30 -0300
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Pundt wrote:
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
deal with lots of internals terms.
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:04:27 +0200
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:46:00PM -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
ECPG - Embedded SQL in C ??
Correct. And the PG part should be obvious. :-)
Pretty Good?
Michael
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:46:00PM -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
ECPG - Embedded SQL in C ??
Correct. And the PG part should be obvious. :-)
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Pundt wrote:
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
abbreviation/acronym inline in a document using a title
Hi,
Le Friday 19 October 2007 22:29:37 Steve Crawford, vous avez écrit :
Do we use that term? Normally for us it's large objects.
Perhaps we should add LO but the documentation does refer to the term
BLOB though typically in the context of The SQL standard defines a
different binary string
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/07 14:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Steve Crawford wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Steve Crawford wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty
On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:59:20 -0300
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Pundt wrote:
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
abbreviation/acronym
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Steve Crawford wrote:
Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
need
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Steve Crawford wrote:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations. Don't know if it's
practical for 8.3 documentation but it would be nice to add even if it
only has a few entries as additional ones could be collected via the
user notes.
I suggest as a discussion
Steve Crawford wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
deal
Thomas Pundt wrote:
Alban Hertroys schrieb:
Isn't this just what the ABBR tag in html is for?
Well, yes; according w3.org its purpose is to describe the
abbreviation/acronym inline in a document using a title attribute:
Can you do that from a SGML DocBook source?
--
Alvaro Herrera
Is there a comprehensive (or semi-comprehensive) on-line list of
commonly used PG-related abbreviations used in PostgreSQL documentation,
mail-lists, etc.? If there is not, would such a list make a reasonable
one-page addition to the PG manual?
Things like GUC and DDL for example. Couldn't find
Steve Crawford wrote:
Is there a comprehensive (or semi-comprehensive) on-line list of
commonly used PG-related abbreviations used in PostgreSQL documentation,
mail-lists, etc.? If there is not, would such a list make a reasonable
one-page addition to the PG manual?
I don't think we have one,
.
No idea what GUC is, though !
Have fun,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Computing Froggy
- Message d'origine
De : Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 18 Octobre 2007, 21h10mn 47s
Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Abbreviation
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
---
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
deal with lots of internals terms.
Also the manual has more reference character; as we saw with GUC in
this discussion it is still possible to find a CORRECT definition of
them.
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Crawford wrote:
Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
need for a reference.
I think it is Grand Unified
Steve Crawford wrote:
Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
need for a
Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 18/10/2007 22:26, Laurent ROCHE wrote:
No idea what GUC is, though !
Grand Unified Contraption? ;-)
Ray (who's just been reading Jules Verne).
It's Global User Configuration. But the confusion does point out the
need for a reference.
-Steve
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Steve Crawford wrote:
Is there a comprehensive (or semi-comprehensive) on-line list of
commonly used PG-related abbreviations used in PostgreSQL documentation,
mail-lists, etc.? If there is not, would such a list make a reasonable
one-page addition to the PG manual?
I
Tom Lane wrote:
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is to add Appendix I. Abbreviations.
It seems more like FAQ material than something for the manual.
I prefer the manual. I would think the list would be pretty long and
deal with lots of internals terms.
--
Bruce Momjian
26 matches
Mail list logo
