Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write: >> Bruce, >> >> As I am not going to be able to help on the coding I won't try to >> comment on it's dificulty. >> >> But I will ask what realistic expectations are for the current NT port >> using cgywin. My current concern is that the installation is ve

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Peter Mount
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, David Warnock wrote: > Bruce, > > As I am not going to be able to help on the coding I won't try to > comment on it's dificulty. > > But I will ask what realistic expectations are for the current NT port > using cgywin. My current concern is that the installation is very >

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce, > > As I am not going to be able to help on the coding I won't try to > comment on it's dificulty. > > But I will ask what realistic expectations are for the current NT port > using cgywin. My current concern is that the installation is very > complex and the useability is poor due to t

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread David Warnock
Bruce, As I am not going to be able to help on the coding I won't try to comment on it's dificulty. But I will ask what realistic expectations are for the current NT port using cgywin. My current concern is that the installation is very complex and the useability is poor due to the need to enter

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Ted Nolan SRI Augusta GA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>yo u write: >Hello, > >My company is pretty impressed with postgre on unix, but we also need a >native port for nt (it is not an option to have our customers install cygwin >on their production systems.) Ideally we would like to see the backend >running as a native s

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Yeah, > > That is pretty much the short of it. My greatest concern undertaking an > effort like this is the resultant #ifdef/#else/#endif mess that I will need > to make of the code. We do a lot of cross-platform development here and > ultimately the code begins to look very ugly to anything

RE: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread David Heinecke
: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port? > Hello, > > My company is pretty impressed with postgre on unix, but we also need a > native port for nt (it is not an option to have our customers install cygwin > on their production systems.) Ideally we would like to see the backend > r

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
> David, > > We could definately use this as we have very similar problems. We would > love to be able to support Win 9x as well. > > If you decide to do this then I will provide from our company least some > time by one or two people to test and help in non coding ways (we have > no c skills).

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Hello, > > My company is pretty impressed with postgre on unix, but we also need a > native port for nt (it is not an option to have our customers install cygwin > on their production systems.) Ideally we would like to see the backend > running as a native service under nt. We have the resour

Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

1999-09-27 Thread David Warnock
David, We could definately use this as we have very similar problems. We would love to be able to support Win 9x as well. If you decide to do this then I will provide from our company least some time by one or two people to test and help in non coding ways (we have no c skills). Regards Dave