On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 11:15 -0400, Chris Barnes wrote:
We would like to get as much performance from our file systems
as possible.
Then avoid RAID 5. Raid 10 is a pretty good option for most loads.
Actually, RAID 5 is quite decent for read-mostly large volume
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Chris
Barnescompuguruchrisbar...@hotmail.com wrote:
You assistance is appreciated.
I have question regarding disk storage for postgres servers
We are thinking long term about scalable storage and performance and would
like some advise or feedback about what
No other takers on this one?
I'm wondering what exactly direct attached storage entails?
At PG Con I heard a lot about using only direct-attached storage, and not a SAN.
Are there numbers to back this up?
Does fibre-channel count as direct-attached storage? I'm thinking it would.
What
You assistance is appreciated.
I have question regarding disk
storage for postgres servers
We are thinking long term about
scalable storage and performance and would like some advise
or feedback about
what other people are using.
We would like to get as much
performance from our file
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Chris
Barnescompuguruchrisbar...@hotmail.com wrote:
We are curious about using SAN with fiber channel hba and if anyone else
uses this technology.
We would also like to know if people have preference to the level of raid
with/out striping.
I used SurfRAID
