Re: [GENERAL] autovacuum logging 8.1

2008-07-18 Thread Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Is there a way to disable some of the autovacuum logging? Yes -- upgrade to a newer version. Autovacuum was primitive in 8.1. It was the first version. Bear with us. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL

[GENERAL] autovacuum logging 8.1

2008-07-17 Thread mikesdenning
Is there a way to disable some of the autovacuum logging? I don't want to see the below log over and over again in the logfile. postgres[85482]: [1-1] : LOG: autovacuum: processing database test_com Thanks, Mike -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make

[GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging Info?

2006-07-09 Thread Ron St-Pierre
Hi, I've been trying to see whether or not autovacuum is vacuuming all of my tables, and how often (for my peace of mind). I can see that it is running, but I don't know what it's doing. There are a handful of key tables in our database which suffer quite a bit if their not vacuumed regularly

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-28 Thread Robert Treat
On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:59, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well, one problem now is that everytime pg_autovacuum opens a database, a message is placed in the logs: LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
Robert Treat wrote: On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:59, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well, one problem now is that everytime pg_autovacuum opens a database, a message is placed in the logs: LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG:

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-28 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Cc: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, Matthew T. O'Connor matthew@zeut.net, Will Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:15:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:59, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Treat wrote: On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:59, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well, one problem now is that everytime pg_autovacuum opens a database, a message is placed in the logs: LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG:

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-27 Thread Will Reese
I found this short discussion between Tom and Bruce, but that's about it for autovacuum logging. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/msg00489.php It just seems like the processing database log statement should be set to a lower level, since it just logs every time

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-27 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Right, I think there has been discussion about this and general agreement that the current autovacuum logging options are less than ideal to put it mildly. Unfortunately, I don't think there has been any action by anyone to do something about it. I hope to work on this at some point, but

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Well, one problem now is that everytime pg_autovacuum opens a database, a message is placed in the logs: LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum: processing database test LOG: autovacuum:

[GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-26 Thread Will Reese
Is there a reason many of the most useful autovacuum.c elog statements are set to DEBUG2? It seems to me that these should be set to LOG. I used autovacuum when it was a contrib module, and it failed after a month. To prevent major performance problems I went back to the daily vacuum.

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-26 Thread Will Reese
I found where I saw that EnterpriseDB has enabled autovacuum logging. Look at item number one under the section entitled Changes in 2006-03-31 update: http://www.enterprisedb.com/readme_dbserver.do Will Reese -- http://blog.rezra.com On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Will Reese wrote: Is

Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Logging

2006-04-26 Thread Jim C. Nasby
I believe 8.2 will have improved autovac logging. Take a look in the -hackers archives for more info. On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:47:26PM -0500, Will Reese wrote: Is there a reason many of the most useful autovacuum.c elog statements are set to DEBUG2? It seems to me that these should be