Re: [GENERAL] BDR concern/issue

2016-03-03 Thread Craig Ringer
On 3 March 2016 at 07:54, cchee-ob wrote: > I queried pg_replication_slots after I removed an BDR node and I noticed a > slot_name that isn't in bdr.bdr_node_slots. And active is 'f' and it has > been retaining bytes. Should I be concerned and is there a way to remove > it. I do still have one

[GENERAL] BDR concern/issue

2016-03-02 Thread cchee-ob
I queried pg_replication_slots after I removed an BDR node and I noticed a slot_name that isn't in bdr.bdr_node_slots. And active is 'f' and it has been retaining bytes. Should I be concerned and is there a way to remove it. I do still have one UDR node which is running (bdr_16385_62289942768143