Re: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL?

2005-09-20 Thread Vivek Khera
On Sep 15, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Logan Bowers wrote:Many of the other folks at the company feel an open-source DB is more risky because it is less well tested compared to commercial counterparts.  I’m looking for examples of large installations of Postgres with huge data sets, high traffic volumes,

Re: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL?

2005-09-18 Thread Jim C. Nasby
Take a look at http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/ for some examples of use. Looking through the pgsql-advocacy mailing list might provide some more cases as well. Of the top of my head, I believe there's at least one national banking system running on PostgreSQL, as well as all of the

Re: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL?

2005-09-18 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On 9/16/05, Logan Bowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for examples of large installations of Postgres with huge data sets, high traffic volumes, high update rates, etc, particularly large, recognizable names. can you tell us/me what do you mean by huge? i heard people saying

[GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL?

2005-09-15 Thread Logan Bowers
Hello, My company is looking at two very large DB vendors to bear most of data burden of our company; however Id like to propose PostgresQL to handle some of the tasks, specifically a large number read-only search DBs. Postgres already has the win in terms of features and its now down

Re: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL?

2005-09-15 Thread Scott Marlowe
Title: RE: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Logan Bowers Sent: Thu 9/15/2005 10:25 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] BIG installations of PostgresQL? Hello, My company is looking at two very