Re: [GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

stuff. Maybe this can be done in a different way than listening for notifications? From: Pavel Stehule [mailto:pavel.steh...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:22 AM To: Jinhua Luo Cc: Ihnat Peter | TSS Group a.s.; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Background worker

Re: [GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

On 4/27/2016 1:40 AM, Ihnat Peter | TSS Group a.s. wrote: I don’t want to create client to do some work in the DB if the DB can do it itself on server side much faster. The situation is that some data are inserted in to many tables and if these data need to be post processed a notification

Re: [GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

stuff. Maybe this can be done in a different way than listening for notifications? From: Pavel Stehule [mailto:pavel.steh...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:22 AM To: Jinhua Luo Cc: Ihnat Peter | TSS Group a.s.; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Background worker

Re: [GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

Why not use libpq in worker? i.e. your worker works just like a pure PG client. In my project, I uses worker in this way and it works well. I do not use any backend API to access the database. 2016-04-21 15:51 GMT+08:00 Ihnat Peter | TSS Group a.s. : > I am trying to create

Re: [GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

Hi Peter! The solution to this problem would be also interesting for me. We have application which use sending data to background worker and it's look like the asynchronous notification can be ideal solution. But we do not found solution how to work with this notifications. Worker calculating

[GENERAL] Background worker with Listen

I am trying to create background worker which listens to notifications and do some work after receiving one. I got 2 problems: - Worker is receiving notifications from every channel not only the registered channel (in my case "foo") - Notifications are not logged in the