Hi,
This is my first mail to this list, so please bear with me.
I'm a computer science student doing a thesis on paging
algorithms, both from a theoretical and practical viewpoint.
I'm currently looking for some standard way of testing the
performance of paging alogrithms. But I haven't been
Is there any benchmark of Postgres 8.00 comparing
with previous versions and others DBMS?
Bruno
: [GENERAL] Benchmarks
Is there any benchmark of Postgres 8.00 comparing with
previous versions and others DBMS?
Bruno
Greetings.
Has anybody produced any benchmarks comparing PostgreSQL to MS SQL
Server? If not, can anybody point me to any sources for standardized
benchmarks that I could run myself on both? The only benchmarks I've
seen so far have been the outdated runs on the MySQL web page, and the
recent
Hi:
I'm looking for some benchmarks for pgsql, better if they use DBI/DBI, so we
could compare psqql versus others DBMS.
Is thete any on the net or someone working on it?
Saludos,
Roberto Andrade Fonseca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Michael Cornelison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 05 January 2000 13:18
Subject: [GENERAL] Benchmarks
I don't know if this is an already talked about issue. If it is I apologize
in advance.
I getting ready to gear up for a major database project.
I am considering
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. wrote:
b) There are quite a few things which you'd take for granted in other DBs
which postgres does not have. Quite late in the day I was shocked to find
that postgres does not have roll-forward transaction logging. They have
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
# d) Postgres manual recommends a nightly vacuum. I read this also a bit
# late. This is equivalent of rebuild database. While this is in
# progress all other clients wait for vacuum release locks. This is
# really a handicap for a 24x7 app.
#
#
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Dustin Sallings wrote:
Untrue, vacuum is *extremely* important for updating statistics.
If you have a lot of data in a table, and you have never vacuumed, you
might as well not have any indices. It'd be nice if you could seperate
the stat update from the storage
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
# Okay, my understanding is that a vacuum does a 'cleanup', while a vacuum
# analyze does a cleanup *and* stats...
That may be correct, but the stats without a cleanup would be a
nice option. :) That would give me the ability to update my
Untrue, vacuum is *extremely* important for updating statistics.
If you have a lot of data in a table, and you have never vacuumed, you
might as well not have any indices. It'd be nice if you could seperate
the stat update from the storage reclaim. Actually, it'd be nice if you
could
ke damn near forever for any number of updates or
deletes greater than, say, 30,000 rows.
[Snip]
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 10:14 AM
To: Dustin Sallings
Cc: The Hermit Hacker; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
000 rows.
#
# [Snip]
#
# -Original Message-
# From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
# Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 10:14 AM
# To: Dustin Sallings
# Cc: The Hermit Hacker; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Benchmarks
#
#
# Untrue, vacuum is *extremely* important for updating s
While on the subject of vacuum. I wonder if
Tom's time will be better utilized at figuring out how to
get rid of vacuum all together rather than trying to fix
it. Simply have that functionality replaced with a more
modern way of data management and query optimization.
That command was nothing but
While on the subject of vacuum. I wonder if
Tom's time will be better utilized at figuring out how to
get rid of vacuum all together rather than trying to fix
it. Simply have that functionality replaced with a more
modern way of data management and query optimization.
That command was
PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kimi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06 January 2000 19:05
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Benchmarks
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. wrote:
b) There are quite a few things which you'd take for granted in other DBs
which postgres does not have. Quite
I don't know if this is an already talked about issue. If it is I apologize
in advance.
I getting ready to gear up for a major database project.
I am considering pgsql and oracle on a Intel/Linux platform.
I did see the comparison of the different feature of all the databases, but
that is not
17 matches
Mail list logo
