On 11/19/10 23:14, Andy Colson wrote:
On 11/19/2010 4:04 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 11/19/10 15:49, Andy Colson wrote:
unlogged will only help insert/update performance. Lookup tables sound
readonly for a majority of time. (I'm assuming lots of reads and every
once and a while updates). I doubt
On 11/19/2010 4:04 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 11/19/10 15:49, Andy Colson wrote:
unlogged will only help insert/update performance. Lookup tables sound
readonly for a majority of time. (I'm assuming lots of reads and every
once and a while updates). I doubt that unlogged tables would speed up
loo
On 11/19/10 15:49, Andy Colson wrote:
unlogged will only help insert/update performance. Lookup tables sound
readonly for a majority of time. (I'm assuming lots of reads and every
once and a while updates). I doubt that unlogged tables would speed up
lookup tables.
Are FreeBSD's temp tables st
On 11/18/2010 4:56 PM, Fredric Fredricson wrote:
Hi,
I have designed a handful databases but is absolutely no SQL-expert. Nor
have I had any formal database training and have never worked with
someone who had. What I know about SQL I have read in the documentation,
found with google, and learned
On 11/18/10 2:56 PM, Fredric Fredricson wrote:
What puzzle me though is that this use is never mentioned in the
discussions, at least as far as I can see. Am I doing something
"strange"? Is this something you should not have to do if you have
"proper" database design?
in certain other enter
Hi,
I have designed a handful databases but is absolutely no SQL-expert. Nor
have I had any formal database training and have never worked with
someone who had. What I know about SQL I have read in the documentation,
found with google, and learned from my numerous mistakes.
This question I ha
