I think we (as in postgres) will probably get the ability to run
individual transactions in such a mode, but you surely wouldn't want to
run every transaction in it.
So, would then these transactions be ”2-phase”?
I mean either all nodes commit the transaction or none of them do?
Or only
13 jul 2014 kl. 21:54 skrev Martin Gudmundsson martingudmunds...@gmail.com:
I think we (as in postgres) will probably get the ability to run
individual transactions in such a mode, but you surely wouldn't want to
run every transaction in it.
So, would then these transactions be
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com:
PgJDBC actually already supports rudimentary client-based failover.
I’ve seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever
implemented? Do you know where it’s
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in ”close
quarters” with low latency it should work ok.
BDR doesn't do synchronous replication _yet_, but it's on the roadmap.
Just
On 2014-07-12 13:23:08 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com:
PgJDBC actually already supports rudimentary client-based failover.
I've seen some mailing list threads
On 2014-07-12 14:37:02 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
It's possible to do it to a streaming replication sync standby, but also
to another BDR node. The logical decoding facility added in 9.4 allows
logical replication solutions to use the same mechanism as streaming rep
does.
12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 07/12/2014 02:42 AM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Hi all!
I was wondering if there are any specific load balancing/failover
functionality planned for client drivers connection to a BDR group. In my
case the jdbc driver, but
Because BDR is asynchronous multi-master _replication_ though, clients
are expected to be aware of some of the anomalies that can occur. A
naïve client that just picked a random BDR server and did the next
transaction on it would be very likely to cause unwanted replication
anomalies,
12 jul 2014 kl. 13:45 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 13:23:08 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
I’ve seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever
implemented? Do you know where it’s documented?
I don't think the patch ever got accompanying documentation.
It's not mentioned here, anyway:
http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/93/connect.html
Failover
12 jul 2014 kl. 14:48 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 14:37:02 +0200, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
It's possible to do it to a streaming replication sync standby, but also
to another BDR node. The logical decoding facility added in 9.4 allows
logical replication
12 jul 2014 kl. 12:33 skrev Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-07-12 18:22:30 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Any ideas giving BDR an option to be synchronous. I mean in ”close
quarters” with low latency it should work ok.
BDR
Hi all!
I was wondering if there are any specific load balancing/failover functionality
planned for client drivers connection to a BDR group. In my case the jdbc
driver, but could be relevant for other drivers as well.
Or is the long term plan that we need we need to rely on middleware like
On 07/12/2014 02:42 AM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
Hi all!
I was wondering if there are any specific load balancing/failover
functionality planned for client drivers connection to a BDR group. In my
case the jdbc driver, but could be relevant for other drivers as well.
PgJDBC actually
15 matches
Mail list logo
