Um , we're trying to push postgres here :)
i was thinking the diagram with "spiffier arrrows"
and some drop shadows with a "ligntened elephant" behind
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
At 03:28 PM 21-02-2000 -0400, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
the image we've chosen is at
You know, you may be better off just choosing a few table like pg_class,
pg_attribute, and pg_type, and pg_proc and showing those in a fancy
manner.
Um , we're trying to push postgres here :)
i was thinking the diagram with "spiffier arrrows"
and some drop shadows with a "ligntened
that's also a good idea.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
You know, you may be better off just choosing a few table like pg_class,
pg_attribute, and pg_type, and pg_proc and showing those in a fancy
manner.
Um , we're trying to push postgres here :)
i was thinking the
At 11:39 AM 22-02-2000 -0400, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
Um , we're trying to push postgres here :)
Yah, but I just couldn't resist..
How about a picture of the Postgres People pushing elephants in various
ways ;).
Link.
p.s. Any sign of the stuffed toy elephant? It's got to be cute tho, e.g.
people pushing elphants ? i say hell with that, we should just buy
2 elphants, breed them and tatoo "PostgreSQL" on the calfs and sell'em.
re: stuffed elephant, supppliers haven't found anything yet, and they
said that these would probably be quite pricy.
jeff
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Lincoln
At 01:29 AM 23-02-2000 -0400, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
people pushing elphants ? i say hell with that, we should just buy
2 elphants, breed them and tatoo "PostgreSQL" on the calfs and sell'em.
Hehe :). We'll call the parents Postmaster and Postmistress. Talk about
spawning child processes ;).
