Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-13 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:38:22AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: Don't get me wrong, if replication is one of the things you need, then consider it, but if you're putting bad data into your database, what good is replicating it gonna do ya? But if real, ORAC-style clustering is what you need,

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-13 Thread Aly S.P Dharshi
Andrew, I disagree, I wouldn't want to contend with all the complexities and kludge of Oracle thank you very much. If there was a way to get PostgreSQL to do better than the current clustering methods, then why not, it would be a big win for us. PostgreSQL *is* an enterprise

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-13 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Aly S.P Dharshi wrote: Andrew, I disagree, I wouldn't want to contend with all the complexities and kludge of Oracle thank you very much. If there was a way to get PostgreSQL to do better than the current clustering methods, then why not, it

[GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-11 Thread Travis Brady
All,Forgive me if this has been answered before, but I've searched the archives and the net extensively and have come up mostly empty so far.I'm working at convincing my firm to implement a postgresql database cluster. Specifically, we'd like to get a few machines running to be more available and

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-11 Thread Aly S.P Dharshi
Hello Travis, I don't know if there are a Oracle RAC style cluster system for PGSQL but this software that can do something similar, http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/feature.html may help. You can always use Slony for replication services. Cheers, Aly. On

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-11 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 15:16, Travis Brady wrote: All, Forgive me if this has been answered before, but I've searched the archives and the net extensively and have come up mostly empty so far. I'm working at convincing my firm to implement a postgresql database cluster. Specifically,

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-11 Thread Alex Stapleton
Don't forget that MySQL replication also has a habit of silently failing on you and in my experience needs continuous monitoring to make sure it actually keeps reasonably up to date (e.g. not days of data behind on the slaves.) That was a while ago though, maybe they fixed it? British

Re: [GENERAL] Cluster/redundancy question

2005-10-11 Thread Jim C. Nasby
Note that pgcluster is statement-based, which has some drawbacks. AFAIK MySQL's 'clustering' is as well. Many people use Slony to replicate to many slaves and use pgpool to hit them. But remember if you do that you need to make sure any statement that changes data hits your master and not the