On 06/01/07 11:16, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
[snip]
My real question in all this is, "What is the problem you are trying
to solve?" Hot failover using combinations of hardware and software,
and a disk array that can be mounted across two machines, is actually
probably good enough for most cases, a
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:58:01PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> What you need are disk blocks to be mirrored to a machine at the DR
> site. Or "continuous PITR" to the DR machine.
I thought you could already do this? (I'm not, but I was pretty sure
someone reported doing it already.)
> This the
On 06/01/07 16:25, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:58:01PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
What you need are disk blocks to be mirrored to a machine at the DR
site. Or "continuous PITR" to the DR machine.
I thought you could already do this? (I'm not, but I was pretty sure
someon
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
How difficult would it be to modify the process (the postmaster?) that writes
the xlogs(?) to tee them to a listening process across the cloud on the DR
machine, which then applies them to the DR database?
On an 8.2 server, you can practically do this ri
> P.S. it's not the "the cloud" anymore, it's "the tubes".
It was always tubes. The cloud was just a convenient simplification for the
technically declined ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
---(end of broadcast)---
