Le mardi 07 février 2012 à 10:30 +0200, Achilleas Mantzios a écrit :
On Τρι 07 Φεβ 2012 07:05:00 John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/03/12 5:53 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
Author's followup:
http://drcoddwasright.blogspot.com/2012/02/damn-you-damocles.html
his links hardly seem
On Τρι 07 Φεβ 2012 07:05:00 John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/03/12 5:53 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
Author's followup:
http://drcoddwasright.blogspot.com/2012/02/damn-you-damocles.html
his links hardly seem related to his proclamations.
From the guy's blog:
Shameless Plug
I know a
On Jan 26, 4:52 pm, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com
wrote:
Quote:
==
This thread
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Multithread-Query-Planner-td5...
was mentioned in a performance sub-group posting. Give
On 02/03/12 5:53 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
Author's followup:
http://drcoddwasright.blogspot.com/2012/02/damn-you-damocles.html
his links hardly seem related to his proclamations.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
My reply is at:
http://ledgersmbdev.blogspot.com/2012/02/robert-young-is-wrong-about-threads-and.html
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:05 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/03/12 5:53 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
Author's followup:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 00:32, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
rdele...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
At 00:32 27/01/2012, you wrote:
There are cases where intraquery parallelism would be helpful. As
far as I understand it, PostgreSQL is the only major, solid (i.e.
excluding MySQL) RDBMS which does not offer some sort of intraquery
parallelism, and when running queries across very large
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com wrote:
At 00:32 27/01/2012, you wrote:
There are cases where intraquery parallelism would be helpful. As far as
I understand it, PostgreSQL is the only major, solid (i.e. excluding MySQL)
RDBMS which does not offer some sort
Quote:
==
This thread
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Multithread-Query-Planner-td5143643.html
was mentioned in a performance sub-group posting. Give it a read.
Back? It means, so far as I can see, that PG is toast.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
rdele...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
==
This thread
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Multithread-Query-Planner-td5143643.html
was mentioned in a performance
Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote on 26.01.2012 22:52:
Oracle claims it for releases going back to 7
Not true.
Quote from the Oracle concepts manual:
Multiple-process Oracle (also called multiuser Oracle) uses several processes to
run different parts of the Oracle Database code and additional
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
rdele...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
==
This thread
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote on 26.01.2012 22:52:
Oracle claims it for releases going back to 7
Not true.
Quote from the Oracle concepts manual:
Multiple-process Oracle (also called multiuser Oracle) uses
13 matches
Mail list logo
