On ons, 2009-11-11 at 08:32 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Peter Eisentraut :
>
> > * The Elements of Style
>
> Hope this doesn't start a flame war, but:
> http://chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497
Yeah, you need to be prepared to reject about 30% of the advice and
In response to Peter Eisentraut :
> * The Elements of Style
Hope this doesn't start a flame war, but:
http://chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On tis, 2009-11-10 at 14:10 -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Well, a lot of hard work. ;-) Just like there are coding standards and
> > best practices, there are standards and customs in writing and
> > publishing.
>
> Are these pub
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Well, a lot of hard work. ;-) Just like there are coding standards and
> best practices, there are standards and customs in writing and
> publishing.
Are these published anywhere?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angel
On tis, 2009-11-10 at 07:00 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> Well, there's the whole Docbook thing, which was pretty well thought
> out. Apart from that, I don't know. Peter?
Well, a lot of hard work. ;-) Just like there are coding standards and
best practices, there are standards and customs in wr
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:23:16AM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:34 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>
> > You might be, but that's approximately what happened. Common editors
> > for this task are Emacs and Vim, each of which has varying levels of
> > support for SGML :)
>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:34 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> You might be, but that's approximately what happened. Common editors
> for this task are Emacs and Vim, each of which has varying levels of
> support for SGML :)
That is amazing. The layout and organization of the PostgreSQL manual
(to me)
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Richard Broersma wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, what are the favorite editor for authoring the
>> PostgreSQL document sgml files?
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/docguide-authoring.html
I'll have to take
David Fetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:09:19PM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, what are the favorite editor for authoring the
> > PostgreSQL document sgml files? (I would be shocked if the whole
> > thing was developed from scratch using a simple text editor.)
>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:09:19PM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what are the favorite editor for authoring the
> PostgreSQL document sgml files? (I would be shocked if the whole
> thing was developed from scratch using a simple text editor.)
You might be, but that's approxi
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Richard Broersma wrote:
Out of curiosity, what are the favorite editor for authoring the
PostgreSQL document sgml files?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/docguide-authoring.html
--
* Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
--
Out of curiosity, what are the favorite editor for authoring the
PostgreSQL document sgml files? (I would be shocked if the whole
thing was developed from scratch using a simple text editor.)
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.post
12 matches
Mail list logo
