Le 02 févr. 2017 à 20:00, Rob Nikander écrivait :
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a project with multiple different data storage backends. I'd
> like to consolidate and use Postgres for more things. In one new situation
> we're starting to use Redis, thinking it will perform better than Postgres for
> a
You can keep using redis and use FDW to access it as if it was a postgres
table.
It does read and write to redis and can present redis data as regular
tables to you.
I never really had to choose between redis and postgres. Postgres was
always for safety and persistance and redis for sharing data an
On 2 February 2017 at 19:00, Rob Nikander wrote:
> I'm working on a project with multiple different data storage backends. I'd
> like to consolidate and use Postgres for more things. In one new situation
> we're starting to use Redis, thinking it will perform better than Postgres
> for a table th
Hi,
I'm working on a project with multiple different data storage backends. I'd
like to consolidate and use Postgres for more things. In one new situation
we're starting to use Redis, thinking it will perform better than Postgres
for a table that is updated a lot by concurrent background jobs.
I'
