On 03.03.2017 16:17, Nicolas Paris wrote:
Nice ! I do have 9.6 version.
Would this kind of index could handle more than 20M large texts ? The
recheck condition looks ressource consuming.
You are right. I think pg_trgm will be not good for such large texts,
unfortunately.
The full text ind
Le 03 mars 2017 à 14:08, Artur Zakirov écrivait :
> On 03.03.2017 15:49, Nicolas Paris wrote:
> >
> >Hi Oleg,
> >
> >Thanks. I thought pgtrgm was not able to index my long texts because of
> >limitation of 8191 bytes per index row for btree.
> >
> >Then I found out it is possible to use pgtrgm over
On 03.03.2017 15:49, Nicolas Paris wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Thanks. I thought pgtrgm was not able to index my long texts because of
limitation of 8191 bytes per index row for btree.
Then I found out it is possible to use pgtrgm over a GIN/GIST index.
My final use case is phrase mining in texts.
I want
Le 27 févr. 2017 à 10:32, Oleg Bartunov écrivait :
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Nicolas Paris wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK there is no built-in way to combine full text search and fuzzy
> matching
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/fuzzystrmatch.html).
>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Nicolas Paris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK there is no built-in way to combine full text search and fuzzy
> matching
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/fuzzystrmatch.html).
> By example, phrase searching with tipos in it.
>
> First I don't know if post
Hello,
AFAIK there is no built-in way to combine full text search and fuzzy matching
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/fuzzystrmatch.html).
By example, phrase searching with tipos in it.
First I don't know if postgresql concurrents (lucene based...) are able
to do so.
Second, is su
