In the general case, is a subselect that uses union less performant
than a union?
I have a query that looks something like this:
select <some columns>
from table1,
table2,
table3
where <where clause>
union
select <select clause>
from table1,
table2,
table3 ref1,
table3 ref2
where <where clause>
I realized today that I could convert the query to
select <some columns>
from table1,
table2,
( select <some columns>
from table3
where <where clause>
union
select <some columns>
from table3 ref1,
table3 ref2
where <where clause> )
where <where clause>
For my specific case, I'll use EXPLAIN to determine the performance
difference. I'll weigh the performance benefits with the maintenance
benefits ( less duplication of code for me on the second case) and
decide (assuming I'm still motivated on Friday ;) ).
But in the general case, do I have to pay special attention with
unions in subselects?
Tim Hart
615-713-9956 :cell
timothyjhart :Y!
tjh...@me.com :AIM
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
