On 22/06/11 10:00, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 10:00 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>> Postgres has nothing quite like the MySQL cluster mode with NDB. You
>> will have to re-think your solution if you want to use postgres to
>> distribute your queries and data across multiple servers.
>>
>
> The
On 06/21/2011 10:00 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
Postgres has nothing quite like the MySQL cluster mode with NDB. You
will have to re-think your solution if you want to use postgres to
distribute your queries and data across multiple servers.
The closest thing to a NDB cluster in PostgreSQL is usi
On 06/21/2011 01:25 PM, David Fetter wrote:
Dynamically generated tables are generally a problem at the design
level. Neither PostgreSQL nor any other engine will solve that.
It depends a bit on what the OP means by dynamically generated tables.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by a "clu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Vikram Vaswani
wrote:
> So my first question is, I'd like to know if PostgreSQL has similar issues
> when running in a clustered scenario.
>
Postgres has nothing quite like the MySQL cluster mode with NDB. You
will have to re-think your solution if you want to us
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:07:10AM +, Vikram Vaswani wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I'm new to PostgreSQL, coming at it from a MySQL background. I'm
> currently looking at switching one of our applications (which
> currently uses MySQL) over to PostgreSQL and had some questions.
>
> We're considering
Hello
I'm new to PostgreSQL, coming at it from a MySQL background. I'm currently
looking at switching one of our applications (which currently uses MySQL) over
to PostgreSQL and had some questions.
We're considering the switch because of issues we have faced when using MySQL
in a clustered sc
