> "CM" == Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me
CM> (possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug,
CM> or rather, a limitation on the implementation.
[[ ... ]]
CM> I don't know about the internals of how transactions
CM> and locks an
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Carlos Moreno wrote:
> Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me
> (possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug,
> or rather, a limitation on the implementation.
Yep. See recent (and historical) discussions on
needing a weaker lock than FOR UPDATE for handling
fo
Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me
(possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug,
or rather, a limitation on the implementation.
I can't find a reasonable justification why the
following would cause a deadlock:
I run two instances of psql using the same DB on
the same machine. On
