Hi Alban,
Thanks for the reply.
1) I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1; So, I can't use RETURNING clause!
2) The function I gave is just to put my understanding! Thanks for spotting the
error though.
Regards,
Siva.
-Original Message-
From: Alban Hertroys [mailto:haram...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Zitat von Siva Palanisamy siv...@hcl.com:
Hi Alban,
Thanks for the reply.
1) I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1; So, I can't use RETURNING clause!
You should Upgrade ASAP! 8.1 is 'out of lifetime'.
Regards, Andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
Hi ya,
I've 2 tables: One being the master (table1) and another being the slave
(table2). I want to lock table1 until the below function completes, and it
should unlock the same at last.
Below is my function. Pls guide me on how to apply locking table1 and unlocking
the same finally. The
On 11/16/11 10:10 PM, Siva Palanisamy wrote:
If there is a better solution, kindly let me know.
use nextval('seqname') ... full transactional integrity without any
blocking or locking.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left
Hi John,
Thanks for the solution. If I use currval('sqlname') in a loop of 7
records, what will happen if a record is inserted manually? I guess it will
alter the sequences, and wrong values/chain might be introduced in foreign
tables in the below function. Could you please clarify me on
On 11/16/11 11:16 PM, Siva Palanisamy wrote:
Thanks for the solution. If I use currval('sqlname') in a loop of 7
records, what will happen if a record is inserted manually? I guess it will
alter the sequences, and wrong values/chain might be introduced in foreign
tables in the below
On 17 Nov 2011, at 7:10, Siva Palanisamy wrote:
If there is a better solution, kindly let me know.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Fun()
RETURNS VOID AS '
DECLARE
Id INTEGER;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO table1 VALUES (DEFAULT, ''Sample'', DEFAULT);
SELECT MAX(id) INTO Id
