Janning Vygen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Thanks to Tom and Peter for your answers. I will design my table without a
> primary key and use my unique index instead of a primary key. As this unique
> key is the same as a primary key i dont see the reason why postgresql
> should't ext
Am Samstag, 31. Juli 2004 17:13 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Janning Vygen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So here is my question: How can i define a functional index to be used
> > with a primary key (using postgreSQL 7.4.3)?
>
> You can't. The SQL spec says that primary keys are columns or lists of
> col
Janning Vygen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So here is my question: How can i define a functional index to be used
> with a primary key (using postgreSQL 7.4.3)?
You can't. The SQL spec says that primary keys are columns or lists of
columns.
I don't see any particular difference between a primar