Re: [GENERAL] Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone

2009-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Gerhard Wiesinger writes: > Ok, the "problem" is: > -- >datetime >= '2009-03-09 00:00:00.0' >AND datetime < '2009-03-10 00:00:00.0' > -- Index Cond: ((datetime >= '2009-03-09 00:00:00+01'::timestamp with time > zone) AND (datetime < '20

Re: [GENERAL] Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone

2009-06-21 Thread Gerhard Wiesinger
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Richard Huxton wrote: Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: Hello, It is unclear to me how implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone works. It's not entirely clear where the problem is. You don't say the results you're getting or what you thought they

Re: [GENERAL] Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone

2009-06-21 Thread Richard Huxton
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: Hello, It is unclear to me how implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone works. It's not entirely clear where the problem is. You don't say the results you're getting or what you thought they should be.

[GENERAL] Implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone

2009-06-20 Thread Gerhard Wiesinger
Hello, It is unclear to me how implicit conversion/comparision of timestamp with and without timezone works. -- -- datetime TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE -- datetime entries are with UTC+01 and UTC+02 done -- 2009-03-09: UTC+01 -- 2009-06-12: UTC+02 -