Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
know/care if a table is > partitioned or not. > > /Mattias > >> -Original Message- >> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: den 11 juni 2008 10:43 >> To: Arbin Mattias >> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [GEN

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-11 Thread Mattias.Arbin
der [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 11 juni 2008 10:43 > To: Arbin Mattias > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows > affected" -> Hibernate problems > > Ah, in my testing I had a single RULE without

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Magnus Hagander >> Sent: den 10 juni 2008 10:43 >> To: Arbin Mattias >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 r

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-10 Thread Mattias.Arbin
nt: den 10 juni 2008 10:43 > To: Arbin Mattias > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows > affected" -> Hibernate problems > > I think that if you use a RULE instead of a TRIGGER to

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-10 Thread Magnus Hagander
tt Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 5 juni 2008 02:01 > To: Arbin Mattias > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> > Hibernate problems > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:38 AM, <[EM

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-10 Thread Mattias.Arbin
nsert statement. /Mattias -Original Message- From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 5 juni 2008 02:01 To: Arbin Mattias Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems On Tue, J

Re: [GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-04 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:38 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have implemented partitioning using inheritance following the proposed > solution here (using trigger): > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html > > My problem is that when my Hibernate application inserts

[GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-04 Thread Mattias.Arbin
I have implemented partitioning using inheritance following the proposed solution here (using trigger): http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html My problem is that when my Hibernate application inserts to the master table, postgres returns "0 rows affected", which caus

[GENERAL] Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems

2008-06-03 Thread Mattias.Arbin
I have implemented partitioning using inheritance following the proposed solution here (using trigger): http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html My problem is that when my Hibernate application inserts to the master table, postgres returns "0 rows affected", which caus