Clodoaldo wrote:
2008/2/29, Brent Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you don't like the standard sql implementation, you could use plsql
or any language to make an abstraction layer/wrapper for this
functionality. Just pass everything as a key/value pair, in an array or
hashtable structure, to
Hi,
I've solved this problem for me (Perl). I have a module DBAPI and write
a function InsertIntoTable($table_name, $hash_with_values,
$data_base_handler).
I send the parms to the function in the hash (key1 => value1, key2
=> value2 ...) and in the function I compose the insert and execute
it.
2008/2/29, Brent Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you don't like the standard sql implementation, you could use plsql
> or any language to make an abstraction layer/wrapper for this
> functionality. Just pass everything as a key/value pair, in an array or
> hashtable structure, to your abstra
If you don't like the standard sql implementation, you could use plsql
or any language to make an abstraction layer/wrapper for this
functionality. Just pass everything as a key/value pair, in an array or
hashtable structure, to your abstraction layer/wrapper, and it can cycle
through the data
2008/2/29, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:17:20PM -0300, Clodoaldo wrote:
> > When inserting into a table and there are many columns to be inserted
> > it is hard to synchronize columns to values:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is there some reason for the insert syntax
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:17:20PM -0300, Clodoaldo wrote:
> When inserting into a table and there are many columns to be inserted
> it is hard to synchronize columns to values:
> Is there some reason for the insert syntax to be the way it is in
> instead of the much easier to get it right Updat
When inserting into a table and there are many columns to be inserted
it is hard to synchronize columns to values:
insert into my_table (
a,
b,
c,
...many more columns
)values(
@a,
@b,
@c,
... the corresponding values
)
Is there some
