Thanks you very much Craig for clearing these facts and sorry for mail sent
only to you by mistake.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Bondwal
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 19:37, Amit Bondwal wrote:
> > Thank you very much all of you for quick response an
On 17 July 2015 at 19:37, Amit Bondwal wrote:
> Thank you very much all of you for quick response and clearing my mind.
Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me directly.
> One more question, can I run a databse of postgres 9.4 on postgres-XL
> cluster?
postgres-XL is based on PostgreSQ
On 17 July 2015 at 15:02, Amit Bondwal wrote:
> I looked at pg_shard, as per my understanding it is for nosql data, in our
> case we are going to use postgresql RDBMS features without nosql, pg_shard
> have lot on limitation as per our case.
You'll find that _most_ products have a lot of limitat
On 17 July 2015 at 17:33, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
> 1,2,3: You can't shard with BDR. It's only for multimaster (at least for
> now). Please read the docs.
You can kind-of shard using table partitioning, but the application
has to deal with shard integration because there's no cross-node
querying. So
1,2,3: You can't shard with BDR. It's only for multimaster (at least for
now). Please read the docs.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Amit Bondwal
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We ae working on a application in which we are using posgresql as a
> database. We are sure that in future it will exten
Hello everyone,
We ae working on a application in which we are using posgresql as a
database. We are sure that in future it will extend to level that we have
to scale it horizontally. We have some tables which are going to be more
than 90% of database size.
I looked at pg_shard, as per my underst
