Boy! That sounds versitile!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
mjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "elein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Vincent Hikida"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [GENERAL]
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "elein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jan Wieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Vincent Hikida"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24,
Yes, it was more powerful because you could do aggregates in the query
independent of the results returned by the query.
The 'by' feature of aggregates always confused me because it would
modify the aggregate WHERE clause (that was independent of the outer
query) and restrict the aggregate to onl
know much about "D" and Dataphor.
>
> Vincent Hikida,
> Member of Technical Staff - Urbana Software, Inc.
> "A Personalized Learning Experience"
>
> www.UrbanaSoft.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antonios Christofides" <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:54:55AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > SQL is only one possible relational query language. It didn't
> > become de facto standard until the mid- to late-80s.
> >
> > It is an outgrowth of SEQEL (Structured English QuEry
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:54:55AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> SQL is only one possible relational query language. It didn't
> become de facto standard until the mid- to late-80s.
>
> It is an outgrowth of SEQEL (Structured English QuEry Language),
> which was IBM's 1st try at a descriptive q
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I understand that SQL is the interface between apps and RDBMS's because
> > of history, not because it is correct design. Could you point me to a
> > link or book or paper that deals with this paradox? Thanks!
>
> I'm not sure what you mea