HI Tomas,
>> No, at least in the current version. The next version (9.2) will support
>> checksums, but it's meant mostly as a protection against failures at the
>> I/O level. It might catch some memory issues, but it certainly won't be
>> 100% protection.
>
>Oh, I see - it was bumped to 9.3 and
On 7.5.2012 00:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:37:47AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 6.5.2012 20:47, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a tool for checking a postgresql database for integrity, so I
>>> would be notified immediatly if something went w
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:37:47AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6.5.2012 20:47, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a tool for checking a postgresql database for integrity, so I
> > would be notified immediatly if something went wrong e.g. with memory
> > and can go back t
Hi,
On 6.5.2012 20:47, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a tool for checking a postgresql database for integrity, so I
> would be notified immediatly if something went wrong e.g. with memory
> and can go back to the last good backup?
> Such a tool would guarantee me I am not sitting on a
Hi,
Is there a tool for checking a postgresql database for integrity, so I
would be notified immediatly if something went wrong e.g. with memory
and can go back to the last good backup?
Such a tool would guarantee me I am not sitting on a ticking time bomb
(corrupted database) without even noticin
