On Thursday 06 October 2005 08:34, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library
and the rest was my own stuff would I
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:26:48PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
I thought it would only be needed if you where distributing the source for
Postgresql.
Does the copyright get distributed with the binary Debian packages?
I haven't been able to find it on my Linux box.
Yes it does, in all
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 19:26 +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
I thought it would only be needed if you where distributing the source for
Postgresql.
Does the copyright get distributed with the binary Debian packages?
I haven't been able to find it on my Linux box.
The copyright of all Debian
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:34:25PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Yes, because libpg.so is licensed under the BSD license. Note that
you can do this in a COPYRIGHT file. It just has to be in all
copies, whatever that means.
AFAIK, this would only apply if he was actually distributing
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:41, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 10/4/05, Welty, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Glenn wrote:
Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
you just can't sue anyone when things go south.
_and_ you need to preserve the copyright
Neil Dugan wrote:
If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library and the
rest was my own stuff would I need to preserve the copyright to somehow?
I wouldn't be distributing any source at all just my executable and the
library.
license preservation is relevant if you
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library and the
rest was my own stuff would I need to preserve the copyright to somehow?
Yes, because libpg.so is licensed under the BSD license. Note that
you can do
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library and
the
rest was my own stuff would I need to preserve the copyright to somehow?
Yes,
From my understanding of the license for Postgresql, there is no
licensing fees as long as you are not selling it yourself for a profit.
There are also free platforms to build your application on. I am myself
exploring the use of Centos with php, postgresql, apache with ssl
running as a
On 10/4/05, Richmond Dyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my understanding of the license for Postgresql, there is no
licensing fees as long as you are not selling it yourself for a profit.
Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
you just can't sue anyone when things
Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 10/4/05, Richmond Dyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my understanding of the license for Postgresql, there is no
licensing fees as long as you are not selling it yourself for a profit.
Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
you just can't
Richmond Dyes wrote:
From my understanding of the license for Postgresql, there is no
licensing fees as long as you are not selling it yourself for a profit.
This is incorrect. Please see the other messages on this thread. The
product you are thinking of is MySQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D.
On 10/4/05, Welty, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Glenn wrote:
Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
you just can't sue anyone when things go south.
_and_ you need to preserve the copyright notices.
excellent point.
---(end of
13 matches
Mail list logo
