Hi,
I have one of my database server that I run the "top" command:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days,
13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52, 3.36
Tasks: 624 total, 1 running, 623 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.4%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.4%id, 12.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 16432240k
Hi,
I have one of my database server that I run the top command:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days, 13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52, 3.36
Tasks: 624 total, 1 running, 623 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.4%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.4%id, 12.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Waldomiro wrote:
I'm afraid of two things, one is the load average, I think 3 is too
much, another is the swap, almost 4GB of swap, I think that is too much
swap.
Am I right?
Not necessarily.
Can I use those indicators to know if my database is ok?
Perhaps.
Waldomiro wrote:
Hi,
I have one of my database server that I run the top command:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days, 13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52,
3.36
Tasks: 624 total, 1 running, 623 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.4%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.4%id, 12.9%wa, 0.0%hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Waldomiro waldom...@shx.com.br wrote:
Hi,
I have one of my database server that I run the top command:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days, 13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52, 3.36
Tasks: 624 total, 1 running, 623 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s):
As a followup to my previous post, here's what a healthy, well behaved
but running under moderate load db server looks like:
top - 15:47:51 up 436 days, 2:31, 3 users, load average: 12.03, 11.86, 12.26
Tasks: 394 total, 7 running, 387 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 17.3%us,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Waldomiro wrote:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days, 13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52, 3.36
Cpu(s): 1.4%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.4%id, 12.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 16432240k total, 16344596k used, 87644k free, 27548k buffers
Swap: 10241428k total,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Waldomiro wrote:
top - 16:16:30 up 42 days, 13:23, 4 users, load average: 3.13, 3.52,
3.36
Cpu(s): 1.4%us, 1.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.4%id, 12.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 16432240k total,
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
In this:
Mem: 16432240k total, 16344596k used,87644k free,27548k buffers
Swap: 10241428k total, 3680860k used, 6560568k free, 6230376k cached
The 6.2G cached is considered part of the 16G used
So it's not using more memory than it
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
In this:
Mem: 16432240k total, 16344596k used,87644k free,27548k buffers
Swap: 10241428k total, 3680860k used, 6560568k free, 6230376k cached
The 6.2G cached is considered part of the 16G used
So it's not using more memory than it has.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Greg Smith gsm...@gregsmith.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
In this:
Mem: 16432240k total, 16344596k used, 87644k free, 27548k buffers
Swap: 10241428k total, 3680860k used, 6560568k free, 6230376k cached
The 6.2G cached is
11 matches
Mail list logo
