Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/15/2013 10:59 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The attached patches resolve the issue.
Should I forward the patches on to the pgsql-hackers list for review or is
this
list sufficient? (First time PostgreSQL hacker.)
Yes, any patches should be posted to
On 08/16/2013 02:12 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Yes, any patches should be posted to -hackers, in this case
with a archive reference to the discussion on -general.
Please readhttp://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
To make sure that the patch does not get lost, add it to
the next
On 08/13/2013 12:35 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
When the client library (version 9.2.x) is compiled with a MinGW-w64
environment
the resulting libpq.dll will not function. This has been reported previously
with two bug reports, which have gone untouched.
Bug 8151:
On 08/15/2013 10:59 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The attached patches resolve the issue.
Should I forward the patches on to the pgsql-hackers list for review or is this
list sufficient? (First time PostgreSQL hacker.)
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Hello,
When the client library (version 9.2.x) is compiled with a MinGW-w64 environment
the resulting libpq.dll will not function. This has been reported previously
with two bug reports, which have gone untouched.
Bug 8151:
On 8/13/2013 10:35 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
What environment does EnterpriseDB use to create their Windows binaries?
They use Microsoft Visual C (I forget the exact version, but I believe
most recent versions are supported, including the Express versions).
--
john r pierce
On 08/13/2013 01:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
They use Microsoft Visual C (I forget the exact version, but I believe most
recent versions are supported, including the Express versions).
Then MinGW should be capable of producing the same binaries.
I've tried early gcc 4.7 and the latest gcc 4.8,
On 8/13/2013 5:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
They use Microsoft Visual C (I forget the exact version, but I believe most
recent versions are supported, including the Express versions).
Then MinGW should be capable of producing the same
On 8/13/2013 2:25 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
They use Microsoft Visual C (I forget the exact version, but I believe most
recent versions are supported, including the Express versions).
Then MinGW should be capable of producing the same binaries.
On 08/14/2013 08:57 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
no. GCC uses a totally different libc in its generated code. that alone
ensures its binaries are not directly comparable.linking code with
incompatible libc's is gonna result in some gnarly messes, imagine what
kind of ugly stuff could happen
10 matches
Mail list logo
