...@commandprompt.com; Gauthier, Dave; r...@iol.ie;
pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Native DB replication for PG
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm curious to get to the bottom of Scott's report. It's possible that
he hit one of the two or three 8.4
On 30/04/2010 21:30, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what’s the best guess on when will v9 be released?
If I had to plan server
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
So, back to the base note, as far as native replication support, I should
wait for v9 whic'll probably be out by the end of the summer?
for 'native' replication waiting for 9.0 is your only option, because
all of the
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
So, back to the base note, as far as native replication support, I should
wait for v9 whic'll probably be out by the end of the summer?
Yep. You should really start testing now though if you're gonna use it.
--
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I tested 8.4 what I thought was fairly hardly last year only
to have 8.4.1 die under the same load that 8.3 handled without a
problem, and reverted to the known working version putting testing
8.4.1 on hold.
So to ME, the choice is a fully functional 8.3 installation that
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I tested 8.4 what I thought was fairly hardly last year only
to have 8.4.1 die under the same load that 8.3 handled without a
problem, and reverted to the known working version putting testing
8.4.1
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:59 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
FYI, since December of 2009 (release of 8.4.2) there have been 10 bugs
fixed with the word crash in their description, as well as 7 memory
leaks that could potentially lead to crash. Even six months ago I was
still hesitant to push 8.4
2010/5/1 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:59 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
FYI, since December of 2009 (release of 8.4.2) there have been 10 bugs
fixed with the word crash in their description, as well as 7 memory
leaks that could potentially lead to crash. Even six months
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I tested 8.4 what I thought was fairly hardly last year only
to have 8.4.1 die under the same load that 8.3 handled without a
problem, and reverted to the known working version putting testing
8.4.1 on hold.
FYI, since December of
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm curious to get to the bottom of Scott's report. It's possible that
he hit one of the two or three 8.4-only crashes we fixed since 8.4.1;
or the bug may still be lurking.
I'll definitely be testing it this summer to see if
Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
FYI, since December of 2009 (release of 8.4.2) there have been 10 bugs
fixed with the word crash in their description, as well as 7 memory
leaks that could potentially lead to crash.
Are we reading the same CVS log? I find quite a
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released?
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what’s the best guess on when will v9 be released?
well, depends on how you define replication, but yes. my _guess_ on
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what’s the best guess on when will v9 be released?
If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
be
[mailto:r...@iol.ie]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:39 PM
To: Scott Marlowe
Cc: Gauthier, Dave; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Native DB replication for PG
On 30/04/2010 21:30, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released?
If I had
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
On 30/04/2010 21:30, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote:
I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
wrong). If so, what’s the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer
Surely you mean 8.4? :-)
No, I would buy the 8.3
20 matches
Mail list logo
