Re: [GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-22 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 15:16, Carlos Felipe Zirbes wrote: > You alway seemed to me a very reasonable and smart person, but to suggest > that just because Fernando Lozano is in Brazil he "may not have even a > Pentium" is, to say the least, a terrible proof of ignorance and prejudice. Whoa. I

Re: [GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-21 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi Carlos, > For your information, we, brazilians, do not have to fight lions on the > street or whatever other things you may imagine. Actually, we are doing very > well as it comes to tecnology. I, for instance, work everyday on a Pentium > III 1Ghz with 256MB of memory and a 17 inch

Re: [GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Monday 20 August 2001 18:09, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > I am not talking just about PostgreSQL now. It is not nice to provide > > support for a number of customers without Unix and Linux culture and > > having to recompile everything from sources. :-( > If you want newer packages, get Re

Re: [GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-20 Thread Lamar Owen
On Sunday 19 August 2001 22:10, Fernando Lozano wrote: > Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using > the older glibc and rpm format? Yes, once I have enough hard drives to have another system image installed. Due to several other issues, I won't be using either a VM

Re: [GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-19 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Fernando Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using > the older glibc and rpm format? FWIW, while a version for RHL 6.2 makes sense because of glibc issues (and other libraries), the supported rpm format for RHL 6.2 is v4. Erratas

[GENERAL] New RPMS ?

2001-08-19 Thread Fernando Lozano
Hi there! Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using the older glibc and rpm format? []s, Fernando Lozano ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster