On Tuesday 21 August 2001 15:16, Carlos Felipe Zirbes wrote:
> You alway seemed to me a very reasonable and smart person, but to suggest
> that just because Fernando Lozano is in Brazil he "may not have even a
> Pentium" is, to say the least, a terrible proof of ignorance and prejudice.
Whoa.
I
Hi Carlos,
> For your information, we, brazilians, do not have to fight lions on the
> street or whatever other things you may imagine. Actually, we are doing very
> well as it comes to tecnology. I, for instance, work everyday on a Pentium
> III 1Ghz with 256MB of memory and a 17 inch
On Monday 20 August 2001 18:09, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > I am not talking just about PostgreSQL now. It is not nice to provide
> > support for a number of customers without Unix and Linux culture and
> > having to recompile everything from sources. :-(
> If you want newer packages, get Re
On Sunday 19 August 2001 22:10, Fernando Lozano wrote:
> Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using
> the older glibc and rpm format?
Yes, once I have enough hard drives to have another system image installed.
Due to several other issues, I won't be using either a VM
Fernando Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using
> the older glibc and rpm format?
FWIW, while a version for RHL 6.2 makes sense because of glibc issues
(and other libraries), the supported rpm format for RHL 6.2 is v4.
Erratas
Hi there!
Are there plans for 7.1.3 RPMS for Red Hat 6.2 and other systems using
the older glibc and rpm format?
[]s, Fernando Lozano
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster