Re: [GENERAL] On defining Perl functions within PLPERL code

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > I thought this claim needs further clarification, since the docs for PLPERL > include a warning that may give readers the impression that defining Perl > functions within PLPERL code is somehow problematic. This warning says: Well, it /is/ p

[GENERAL] On defining Perl functions within PLPERL code

In a recent post I mentioned that I had a PLPERL procedure that ...adds useful definitions, mostly subs, to Perl's main package. I thought this claim needs further clarification, since the docs for PLPERL include a warning that may give readers the impression that defining Perl functions within