Hi. Further to my bafflement with the count(*) queries as described
in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-01/msg00804.php
It seems that whenever this question has come up, Postgresql comes up
very short in terms of count(*) functions.
The performance is always slow,
Phoenix Kiula phoenix.ki...@gmail.com writes:
My question: with that kind of volume and the underlying aggregation
functions (by product id, dates, possibly IP addresses or at least
countries of origin..) will PG ever be a good choice?
Well, only you're able to judge that for your own data
