Andy Anderson wrote:
However, being a GUI-oriented person I haven't noticed management tools
comparable to phpMyAdmin (for web) and CocoaMySQL (for Mac). Perhaps
someone can enlighten me?
(Yes, I've tried pgAdmin, but it's not quite ... right. I can't say why
at the moment, I should probably
Have you tried Navicat? The light version is free for the Mac (I think).
Andy Anderson wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
*) Much better shell
I tend to agree based on my limited experience.
However, being a GUI-orien
On May 13, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
*) Much better shell
I tend to agree based on my limited experience.
However, being a GUI-oriented person I haven't noticed management
tools comparable to phpMyAdmin (for web) and CocoaMySQL
It surely rocks. We switched from MySql to PostgreSQL about a year ago
and have never looked back, we are happy as Larry. A bit more
information on our web site.
http://www.alerce.com.au
Regards,
Mario
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Merlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
> Gauthier, Dave wrote:
>> Ive been invited to participate in a forum which discusses
>> technical issues for relational DBs used in the corporation. The 3
>> DBs they are discussing are Oracle, SQL-Server and MySQL. Id like
>> to introduce PG, but
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 12:09:28 Kevin Hunter wrote:
> * The documentation on the website for Postgres is by far the better of
> the two DBs. MySQL's is decent and very useful, but Postgres'
> documentation just plain rocks. In fact, the Postgres documentation is
> one of the very best examples of
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
*) Transactional DDL: much safer and easier to roll out changes to 24/7 systems
And I totally agree with everything you said Merlin. Especially about
t
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are some other things we have v. mysql:
> *) Transactional DDL: much safer and easier to roll out changes to 24/7
> systems
It's also useful for lots and lots of other things. For instance,
let's say you had an ind
At 10:39a -0400 on Tue, 13 May 2008, Dave Gauthier wrote:
> I’d like to introduce PG,
> but want to be able to address the "Why not use MySQL" questions when
> they arise. I know in the past there have been many comparisons between
> the 2 DBs but would like to know if there are any good, recent o
Le mardi 13 mai 2008, Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
> I suggest you take a look at:
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2575733/The-future-of-MySQL-The-Project
> http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html
> http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/04/17/what-mysql-can-learn-from-p
>ostgresql http://www.commandpr
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been invited to participate in a forum which discusses technical
> issues for relational DBs used in the corporation. The 3 DBs they are
> discussing are Oracle, SQL-Server and MySQL. I'd like to introduce PG, b
Gauthier, Dave wrote:
Hi:
I’ve been invited to participate in a forum which discusses technical
issues for relational DBs used in the corporation. The 3 DBs they are
discussing are Oracle, SQL-Server and MySQL. I’d like to introduce PG,
but want to be able to address the “Why not use MySQL
Hi:
I work for a large corporation that uses many different databases. I
used to use Oracle but then moved away, mainly because of the expense
and complexity. I wanted to stay on Linux, so I shy'ed away from
SQL-Server. Many others around here use MySQL, but I decided to go with
Postgres bec
13 matches
Mail list logo
