Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-30 Thread Don Baccus
At 07:50 PM 11/30/00 -0600, GH wrote: >On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:58:29AM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth: >> At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote: >> >> >What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API? >> >> I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in u

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-30 Thread Don Baccus
At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote: >What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API? I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in using AOLserver, since the simple and efficient database API is the main attraction. So I think there's a pretty good chance it

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-22 Thread mlw
carl garland wrote: > > >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went > >significantly above 10/sec? > > I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They are > using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional > overhead of maki

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-20 Thread Don Baccus
At 09:27 AM 11/15/00 -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote: > AOLServer isn't the only system that can pool database connections, so >can servlets/JSP, ColdFusion, ASP, etc. No doubt AOLServer would be more >widely accepted if it used something other than TCL. There are two separate modules that support

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-20 Thread Don Baccus
At 01:53 PM 11/15/00 -0500, markw wrote: >I'd rather not pollute the application's SQL with postgres-isms. Not that I >don't love postgres, but there are always critics looking for a reason to use >Oracle or (gasp) MS-SQL. Define some global variable with the name of the database being run (curr

Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-20 Thread Don Baccus
At 11:22 AM 11/13/00 -0500, Robert D. Nelson wrote: >Still...Regardless of what database they're running, either their >abstraction layer is shit or their queries really need optimized. Is that >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went >significantly above 10/sec? Th

RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert D. Nelson > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 12:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Michael Fork; Poul L.Christiansen > Cc: pgsql-general; pgsql-hackers > Subject: [HACKERS] RE: [G

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-17 Thread Martin A. Marques
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > What is the value for MinSpareServers in your apache's conf? If that's > set to 20, then even if you only hit your site 20 times (one for each), > that many apache processes will continue to live and therefore keep a db > connection open..?? > > Wh

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-17 Thread Philip Hallstrom
> On Jue 16 Nov 2000 22:54, Marko Kreen wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > > I run PHP4 and IMP (http://www.horde.org) and we've gotten then to remove > > > the useof pg_pconnect() since it is broken. Broken how, you might > > > ask? Well, I r

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-17 Thread Martin A. Marques
On Jue 16 Nov 2000 22:54, Marko Kreen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > I run PHP4 and IMP (http://www.horde.org) and we've gotten then to remove > > the useof pg_pconnect() since it is broken. Broken how, you might > > ask? Well, I ran on a stan

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-16 Thread The Hermit Hacker
rom: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "carl garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-16 Thread Adam Lang
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL > Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-15 Thread Charles Tassell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM >Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote: > > > > # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-15 Thread Adam Lang
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PH

Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

2000-11-13 Thread Poul L. Christiansen
And now it's on www.slashdot.org ... http://slashdot.org/articles/00/11/13/1342208.shtml Poul L. Christiansen Michael Fork wrote: > > Thought this may be of interest to some... > > http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3 > > Michael Fork - CCNA - MCP - A+ > Network Support - Toled