On 11/4/06, Alexander Staubo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am designing an application which requires fine-grained role-basedsecurity, where every logical object in the system has an ACL whichexpresses the permissions allowed by roles.
Have you considered viel for Postgres ()? Here's what it says in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Sullivan) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:40:18PM -0800, Marc Munro wrote:
>> You will of course be replicating the underlying tables and not the
>> views, so your replication user will have to have full access to the
>> unsecured data. This is natural and should not
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:40:18PM -0800, Marc Munro wrote:
> You will of course be replicating the underlying tables and not the
> views, so your replication user will have to have full access to the
> unsecured data. This is natural and should not be a concern but may be
> worth explicitly docum
On Mon, 2006-06-11 at 22:27 +0100, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2006, at 21:00 , Marc Munro wrote:
>
> > For an alternative approach, you might want to check out Veil:
> > http://pgfoundry.org/projects/veil
>
> Addendum: I took Veil to be undocumented since the source archive
> only come
I am designing an application which requires fine-grained role-based
security, where every logical object in the system has an ACL which
expresses the permissions allowed by roles.
Implementing this on a high level is trivial, but it must scale, and
scale extremely well. I have some fairly
