Scott Marlowe escribió:
In this thread getting a bounce from advocacy won't bother me too
much. Having hundreds ot bounce messages in a busy thread, would be
much much worse.
Yup.
I wonder, if all the mailing lists are run by the same software,
wouldn't it be easy enough to have a kind of
Hello,
It is now 2009 and time for a, Thanks for all the laughs 2008!
2008 was the year that PgUS spent getting its feet under itself. We
formed our board, filed all of our legally required paperwork, paid a
lot of money to attorneys, held elections and even managed to have some
fun by working
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
It is now 2009 and time for a, Thanks for all the laughs 2008!
That's all great, congratulations.
In the future please do not spam multiple lists with the same message.
Or rather, if you want the message to appear in more than one list,
please CC them all in a
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
It is now 2009 and time for a, Thanks for all the laughs 2008!
That's all great, congratulations.
In the future please do not spam multiple lists with the same message.
Or rather, if you want the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
In the future please do not spam multiple lists with the same message.
Or rather, if you want the message to appear in more than one list,
please CC them all in a single message instead of sending one message
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 20:18 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Cross posting is not necessarily bad; in fact it's regarded to be less
annoying than multiposting, which is what you did. For argumentation,
see here
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html#why
(If you want it to be even
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
In the future please do not spam multiple lists with the same message.
Or rather, if you want the message to appear in more than one list,
please CC them all
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Cross posting is not necessarily bad; in fact it's regarded to be less
annoying than multiposting, which is what you did. For argumentation,
see here
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html#why
Well
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
(If you want it to be even more pain-free, add a Reply-To:
pgsql-advocacy header or some such.)
Yeah, actually that doesn't work.
Hmm, it doesn't work how? I admit I haven't tried it, so
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Well cross-posting is especially annoying on subscriber-only moderated lists
such as ours. Anyone who follows up to an email who isn't subscribed to all
the lists will
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Well cross-posting is especially annoying on subscriber-only moderated
lists
such as ours. Anyone who follows up to an email who isn't
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Well cross-posting is especially annoying on subscriber-only
12 matches
Mail list logo
