Re[2]: [GENERAL] Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = something

2001-03-30 Thread Alexey Borzov
Greetings, Tom! At 29.03.2001, 12:52, you wrote: TL Alexey Borzov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The development docs state that one can use SET SEED to seed the random number generator TL Where? I see no such claim. Right here: http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/sql-set.html

Re: Re[2]: [GENERAL] Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = something

2001-03-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alexey Borzov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe the whole matter was clarified enough, so now you seem to have two options: either change everything back, or update the docs (add BIG BOLD letters that SET SEED is now obsolete) ;] We changed it back, so the docs are still okay ;-)

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = something

2001-03-29 Thread Tom Lane
Alexey Borzov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The development docs state that one can use SET SEED to seed the random number generator Where? I see no such claim. If there's something that leads you to think that SET SEED and not setseed() is correct, then the docs need to be fixed.

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = something

2001-03-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: Alexey Borzov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The development docs state that one can use SET SEED to seed the random number generator Where? I see no such claim. If there's something that leads you to think that SET SEED and not setseed() is correct, then the docs need to

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql-7.1RC1: SET SEED = something

2001-03-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, this used to work, but for some reason it's called 'set random_seed' now. I seem to be responsible for this, although I can't imagine what the motivation might have been. Should I change it back? If "set seed" worked in 7.0.* then I think