Is there a libpq porting to QNX 4.25? I just tried to compile one of the
modules, but was rejected because the QNX's standard library have not an
Int64 type.
TIA
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.or
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:27:56 -0300, marcelo
wrote:
>Is there a libpq porting to QNX 4.25? I just tried to compile one of the
>modules, but was rejected because the QNX's standard library have not an
>Int64 type.
>TIA
QNX 4.25 is very old (mid 90's) - its toolchain compiler would be C90
unless
I'm pretty sure that Watcom 9.6 libraries lacks long long or any such
variants.
And, of course, I don' t have another tool chain.
Thank you
On 21/08/17 22:20, George Neuner wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:27:56 -0300, marcelo
wrote:
Is there a libpq porting to QNX 4.25? I just tried to compile
marcelo writes:
> Is there a libpq porting to QNX 4.25? I just tried to compile one of the
> modules, but was rejected because the QNX's standard library have not an
> Int64 type.
We removed QNX support in 8.2, so you could try using some pre-8.2
release. It's possible it was broken for awhile
Thank you, Tom.
We'll replace those QNX machines with WIndows XP ones (via dual boot),
so we can use our Devart's ORM the same as the most "user oriented"
applications.
On 22/08/17 12:39, Tom Lane wrote:
marcelo writes:
Is there a libpq porting to QNX 4.25? I just tried to compile one of t
On 2017-08-22 12:57:15 -0300, marcelo wrote:
> We'll replace those QNX machines with WIndows XP ones
The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed.
SCNR,
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer| we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) || b
Hi Peter
Do you believe the only path is Windows 10?
Those machines are commanding Zebra printers and collecting data in a
very harsh environment. So, the cheaper, the better.
Why not Linux? Simply because I have Devart's Entity Developer and
linqConnect to interface with postgres and I prefer
>
> Do you believe the only path is Windows 10?
Not Peter...But I believe there are better choices considering if this has
to be on any sort of network, you're going to be potentially vulnerable to
any number of never-to-be-patched security holes. Using XP in this day and
age is a hard argument